Browsing by Author "Guevara Gil, Armando"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A Continental View of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights(Universidad para el Desarrollo Andino, 2021) Guevara Gil, ArmandoLa bibliografía sobre los pueblos indígenas americanos o cualquier otra temática de dimensión continental se caracteriza por un sesgo notorio. Trata los mismos tópicos bajo la presunción incuestionable de una desconexión radical entre el hemisferio norte y sur. Los famosos Latin American Handbooks son un claro ejemplo de este divorcio. Asumimos, acríticamente, las narrativas nacionales, regionales e historiográficas que surgieron a raíz de los juegos geopolíticos decimonónicos entre el expansionismo norteamericano, los intentos españoles de reflotar su orbe indiano y los afanes imperiales de Napoleón III que enfatizaban la latinidad de las naciones al sur del Río Grande.Item Autoevaluación institucional y mejora continua en una universidad de la provincia constitucional del Callao(Universidad para el Desarrollo Andino, 2021) Guevara Gil, Armando; Yaque Rueda, Lourdes MarleneEl propósito es el determinar cómo se está en implementado la autoevaluación institucional mediante la mejora continua en la Universidad Nacional del Callao. Se ha utilizado como metodología el análisis documental mediante la revisión de textos referidos a autoevaluación institucional y acreditación, provenientes del Sistema Nacional de Evaluación, Acreditación y Certificación de la Calidad de Educativa la organización seleccionada. La tesis está en relacionar la autoevaluación institucional y la mejora continua para el beneficio de una organización universitaria en Perú. El enfoque está basado en normativa vigente en Perú. Las conclusiones se desprenden de las interrelaciones de los argumentos escritos.Item DERECHO, DESARROLLO Y CIENCIA MODERNA: RELACIONES ANTAGÓNICAS(Universidad para el Desarrollo Andino, 2021) Guevara Gil, ArmandoEn la imaginación moderna, el Derecho y la ciencia operan sinérgicamente al servicio del desarrollo. Sin embargo, ambas disciplinas mantienen relaciones antagónicas porque trabajan con métodos, regímenes de verdad y formas de representación de la realidad divergentes. Inclusive, gracias a la propiedad performativa del lenguaje, en el mundo del Derecho la verdad legal puede acabar derrotando a la verdad científica. El resultado es una tensión epistemológica que dificulta el diálogo interdisciplinario e impacta negativamente en la cooperación interdisciplinaria en aras del desarrollo. Además, el Derecho estatal compite con otros ordenamientos normativos vigentes en los espacios sociales sometidos a intervenciones desarrollistas. Las limitaciones que exhiben tanto la ciencia como el Derecho modernos para comprender y cambiar mundos tan complejos exigen el desarrollo de nuevos sistemas de conocimiento.Item Indigenous Peoples, Identity, and Free, Prior, and Informed Consultation in Latin America(Universidad para el Desarrollo Andino, 2021) Guevara Gil, ArmandoThis chapter documents the social life of the right to free, prior, and informed consultation in Latin America. Challenging the original intent of the signatories of International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989), Indigenous peoples, subaltern communities, and their advocates—a tacit coalition of activists, scholars, judges, legislators, and diplomats—work at the intersection of law and anthropology to redefine and substantiate the right to consultation. Two movements characterize this endeavour. First, the right is being broadened, significantly expanding the legal subjects able to claim its enforcement. Second, consultation is being upgraded from a soft to a solid right, deepening it, so to speak, as a way of overcoming the procedural trap that reduces consultations to rituals of domination. Interestingly, corporations and multilateral banks are acknowledging this decolonizing reinterpretation of the right to free, prior, and informed consultation. While its full-blown implementation as an expression of the right of Indigenous self-determination is still utopian, both broadening and deepening the right to consultation empower Indigenous and subaltern communities in their daily struggles against extractivism and developmentalism.Publication Law and Diversity: European and Latin American Experiences from a Legal Historical Perspective. Vol. 1: Fundamental Questions(PETER COLLIN AGUSTÍN CASAGRANDE (EDS.), 2023) Guevara Gil, Armando; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON LEGAL HISTORYIt is likely that Ralf Seinecke never imagined that a Peruvian scholar with a cursory knowledge of German legal theory would comment on his text or that his contribution would have a direct and significant impact on Latin American legal scholarship, particularly in the fields of legal history and legal pluralism. In my view, and in a positive turn of the law of unintended consequences, this is bound to happen when Latin American scholars realize how important pluralistic legal thought was for the iconic German legal thinkers they study, and sometimes worship. Hopefully, this will generate a chain reaction of reinterpretations and research aimed at reassessing the role of legal pluralism in the historical and contemporary configuration of Latin American law. To comment on his contribution, I first refer to Seinecke’s careful rendering of the central role pluralistic legal thought played in shaping the ideas of some of the most important German thinkers of the last two hundred years. I am not interested in rehearsing his main theses, but, rather, in highlighting some aspects that may be useful for exploring implicit pluralistic legal thought and its institutionalization in Latin America, particularly in Peru. Second, I stress the short circuit between legal history and legal anthropology, and mainly legal pluralism. Despite the calls for a rapprochement, the strong bias towards conflating legal pluralism with ethnic and cultural diversity hinders any fruitful dialogue between these disciplines. Thus, the different and conflicting regulatory regimes enforced throughout Peruvian modern history are neither presented nor theorized as exemplifying legal pluralism. Third, I offer some examples of the officially multiplex legal world that 19th-century Peruvians inhabited. Legal pluralism was not only a sociological reality acknowledged by the authorities but also a state-sanctioned normative and institutional multiverse, albeit unsystematic and conflictive, given the secular structural weakness of the modern Peruvian state.1 It is only at the beginning of the 20th century, when centralization was accomplished in several legal fields, that official legal pluralism recedes and specializes on the ‘Indian question’. This development has led legal anthropologists and pluralists to make the false and reductionist equation between legal pluralism and ethnocultural diversity.2 Finally, I conclude that in order to reassess the history of Peruvian law, it is important to take into account how central legal pluralism was to German legal scholarship. Legal historical and anthropological studies should coalesce in this inquiry.Publication Standardisation was never a goal of the Peruvian liberal legislator(uni muenster, 2023) Guevara Gil, ArmandoIn 1821, Peru gained independence from the Spanish colonial empire. Despite the new legal codes issued in the young republic, the country was still shaped by a historically evolved legal pluralism. The legal anthropologist and historian Armando Guevara Gil takes a micro-historical approach to modern Peruvian legal history. He examines the phenomenon of runaway nuns in the early 19th century – cases on the intersection between secular and church law. In the interview, he comments on the state of Peruvian legal-historical research and argues in favour of paying attention to the microcosm of the individuals’ perceptions and agency.Item Survey data on the impact of COVID-19 on parental engagement across 23 countries(Universidad para el Desarrollo Andino, 2021) Guevara Gil, Armando; Osorio-Saez, Eliana Maria; Nurullah Eryilmaz; Andres Sandoval-Hernandez, Yui-Yip Lau; Elma Barahona; Adil Anwar Bhatti; Godfried Caesar Ofoe; Leví Astul Castro Ordóñez; Artemio Arturo Cortez Ochoa; Rafael Ángel Espinoza Pizarro; Esther Fonseca Aguilar; Maria Magdalena Isac; K V Dhanapala; Kalyan Kumar Kameshwara; Geberew Tulu Mekonnen; José Fernando Mejía; Catalina Miranda; Shehe Abdalla Moh'd; Ricardo Morales Ulloa; K Kayon Morgan; Thomas Lee Morgan; Sara Mori; Forti Ebenezah Nde; Silvia Panzavolta; Lluís Parcerisa; Carla Leticia Paz; Oscar Picardo; Carolina Piñeros; Pablo Rivera-Vargas; Alessia Rosa; Lina Maria Saldarriaga; Adrián Silveira Aberastury; Y M Tang; Kyoko Taniguchi; Ernesto Treviño; Carolina Valladares Celis 6; Cristóbal Villalobos; Dan Zhao, Allison ZiontsThis data article describes the dataset of the International COVID-19 Impact on Parental Engagement Study (ICIPES). ICIPES is a collaborative effort of more than 20 institutions to investigate the ways in which, parents and caregivers built capacity engaged with children’s learning during the period of social distancing arising from global COVID-19 pandemic. A series of data were collected using an online survey con- ducted in 23 countries and had a total sample of 4,658 par- ents/caregivers. The description of the data contained in this article is divided into two main parts. The first part is a descriptive analysis of all the items included in the survey and was performed using tables and figures. The second part refers to the construction of scales. Three scales were con- structed and included in the dataset: ‘parental acceptance and confidence in the use of technology’, ‘parental engage- ment in children’s learning’ and ‘socioeconomic status’. The scales were created using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Multi-Group Confirmatory Analysis (MG-CFA) and were adopted to evaluate their cross-cultural comparability (i.e., measurement invariance) across countries and within sub- groups. This dataset will be relevant for researchers in dif- ferent fields, particularly for those interested in international comparative education.Item The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law(Universidad para el Desarrollo Andino, 2021) Guevara Gil, ArmandoI first met André on Saturday, September 1st, 2001. I visited him and his beloved wife Yolanda at their home in Bickerseiland, Amsterdam, after attending the inaugural MARE Conference organized by Maarten Bavinck. I saw him for the last time on Sunday, December 1st, 2019 in his nursing home at Haarlem, thanks to the kindness of his brother Jan, his friends Theo Konijn and Trudi Frankhuizen, and my old friend Erik Weiffenbach. I assured him I was going to return in the spring of last year, but the pandemic prevented me from fulfilling my promise. Unfortunately, he passed away on November 16th, 2020, so I am left with only these hesitant words to honour an outstanding scholar, mentor and friend.